Personal statement Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 8

Personal statement - Essay Example er’s degree in the United States and was considered to be a very good specialist, therefore, the senior faculties were asking me if I was good in statistics as well as in SPSS. It was not very pleasant for me to see that they really got disappointed when I said that unfortunately, I was not. When I asked them about the reason behind asking me they explained that they were looking for help in statistics course. This was a great surprise for me and I really couldn’t understand why they asked me as they have a person who taught that course and I assumed that she should have been a specialist in the field. I didn’t bother myself to find out this since I was busy teaching other courses. At the same time it was upsetting that I could not provide any help when I was asked for it. As I’m working as a lecturer I have an opportunity and great desire to receive PhD. Therefore, I did apply for several universities and I was lucky enough to be accepted in George Mason University (GMU) but I faced a problem connected with statistics again as I did not have a statistics course in my master, but it was necessary to enter GMU. Consequently, GMU required me to take a pre-request course of statistics. The good thing was that course was online so I did not have to travel to the USA for a summer course and the bad thing was that my background in statistics is not good enough to start with online course. I understood that I should improve my statistics as soon as possible as I had statistics in my undergraduate and I started to struggle. To tell the truth, at first I hesitated whether to take the course or not. I called my friend who is studying at GMU to get her advice. She told me if I don’t take it this summer I will not definitely be enrolled in a PhD program. In other word, I’ll have to wait a year. After her advice, I decided to take the online pre-request course of statistics. I enrolled in the course and the drama started. At the beg inning I needed some help with

Open topic logos based argumentative paper Essay

Open topic logos based argumentative paper - Essay Example Most Congressmen admit to not have reading the Act before voting to pass it but those voting in favor were overwhelming. Only one of 99 Senators (Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold) and 66 of 423 Representatives voted against the law. The PATRIOT Act, as many citizens and legal experts alike have argued, violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution’s first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights (Savage, 2006). This includes the freedom of speech and assembly (First Amendment); the freedom from unreasonable search and seizure (Fourth Amendment); the right to due process of law (Fifth Amendment); the right to a speedy, public and fair trial along with the right to counsel and to confront the accuser, (Sixth Amendment), the freedom from cruel and unusual punishment (Eighth Amendment) and freedom from punishment without conviction (13th Amendment). One of the most obvious tactics in the ‘War on Terror’ and the PATRIOT Act is the widespread use of racial profiling, described as when law enforcement officials use race, ethnicity, religion and even color of skin to determine which persons are more probable to commit a crime such as terrorism. The term ‘War on Terror’ has been continually invoked to justify breaches of the Constitution as well as the basic civil liberties of citizens and foreigners alike. The invocation of this phrase has repeatedly prohibited rational discussions regarding civil injustices such as profiling individuals based on their race. Therefore racial profiling has continued unabated including the profiling of young black men since September 11, 2001. The not-so-subtle insinuation is that â€Å"one cannot condemn racial profiling because to do so will hinder the war on terrorism and undermine national security† (McDonald, 2001). The popularly stated position is that racial profiling is necessary because not using this tool of law enforcement would compromise the effort against terrorism thus